A new Pull Request was created by @gzevi for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Changes to Egamma/Electrons plots: separate +/- endcap for alignment,

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/EGamma

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

The usual DQM tests (python whiteRabbit.py -j4 -n1,2,11,12) work in CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-05-11-2300, but they fail in CMSSW_7_4_X, even without this commit.
Error looks like:
-bash-4.1$ more 1431440645/11/p11.1.log
Conditions read from CMS_CONDITIONS via FrontierProd
DQMStore: verbosity set to 2
DQMStore: QTest verbosity set to 0
DQMStore: Scaling Flag set to 0
----- Begin Fatal Exception 12-May-2015 16:24:36 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'PluginLibraryLoadError' occurred while
[0] Constructing the EventProcessor
Exception Message:
unable to load /afs/cern.ch/work/g/gzevi/EGM/Commissioning/Fresh/Test2/CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-05-11-2300/lib/slc6_amd64_gcc491/poisoned/plugin-poisoned-MagneticFieldParametrizedEngin
ePlugins.so because /afs/cern.ch/work/g/gzevi/EGM/Commissioning/Fresh/Test2/CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-05-11-2300/lib/slc6_amd64_gcc491/poisoned/plugin-poisoned-MagneticFieldParametrized
EnginePlugins.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

@gzevi That error usually means you have an inconsistent build area. Have you done a git cms-checkdeps -a ?

please test

+1
provided it passes the tests

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9050/4646/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6, could we ask for your signature here, if you approve the changes?
These DQM Offline plots would be helpful for electron commissioning, and I realized today (looking at stable beams) that they had not yet been merged.
Thank you!

+1